Love Your Neighbor News: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 - Cal
Transcrição
Love Your Neighbor News: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 - Cal
NEIGHBOR NEWS LOVE YOUR THE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE COMMON WITNESS COALITION • Affirmation Methodists for LGBTQ Concerns • Black Methodists for Church Renewal • • Methodist Federation for Social Action • •National Federation of Asian American United Methodists • • Native American International Caucus • Reconciling Ministries Network • • United Methodist Association of Ministers with Disabilities • generalconference2012.org INSIDE SPECIAL SECTION: LETTER TO AN AFRICAN DELEGATE Pages 1, 3-6 Dr. James Cone: Sunday Worship page 2 NFAAUM: Inclusion Begins with Hospitality Tuesday, May 1, 2012 Lettre au délégué africain par Jorge Lockward 18 février 2012 Cher frère, Dans votre dernier e-mail vous a demandé s’il y avait des recommandations a vous offrir en ce qui concerne la Conférence générale. Votre demande m’encourage a partager avec vous ce que j’ai au cœur. Je vous écris comme a un ami, un collègue de travail en la mission pour Dieu et comme a un compatriote délégué à la Conférence générale. Comme vous le savez, la position officielle de l’UMC page 7 love makes a family Page 8 Love Your Neighbor Chaplain 813-200-8860 Love Your Neighbor Office 813-416-5569 Check out our website: gc12.org Follow the Twitter hashtag: #gc12love Jorge Lockward. Photo gracieuseté de Religious Communicators Council en ce qui concerne lespersonnes gaies et lesbiennes a été l’un des problèmes les plus douloureux que l’église fait face depuis la Conférence générale 1972. Je joins un recueil produit par des Communications des Méthodistes Unies des actions de la Conférence Générale sur ces sujets depuis 1972. Lors de ma dernière visite à Harare, au Zimbabwe, plusieurs délégués africains ont parlé avec passion sur cette question. En les écoutants, leurs préoccupations révéleraient deux nouvelles idées pour moi que je voudrais partager avec vous. The above is an excerpt of the letter to an African Delegate. For the full letter and translations, see pages 3-6. Bishop Yambasu: ‘What Binds Us Together is Stronger Than Lines of Difference’ page 7 Reconciling Communities Top 500 Volume 1, Issue 7 by Derrick Spiva T he Africana Dinner Saturday night featured Bishop John Yambasu of Sierra Leone, who preached that the love of God binds us together much stronger than divisions of race, sexual orientation, or even family affiliation. Yambasu is resident United Methodist bishop of Sierra Leone. The dinner was sponsored by Black Methodists for Church Renewal, a partner with the Common Witness Coalition. Yambasu spoke of sexual orientation as one of many identities that tie people together. He stated that people relate better to those who share the same sexual orientation. He also stressed the difficulty to talk about sexuality, both in Africa and in the United States. “I’m reminded here that in Africa, sex is a very delicate issue that you don’t openly talk about,” Yambasu stated. “And I also understand that here in America it is also just as sensitive.” However, Yambasu then lifted up the diverse United Methodists who offer support for Africa University, the premiere United Methodist-supported university in Africa. He offered thanks for the support of the young students who were present in the room, and noted that their education was due to support that came across lines of division. All of us called United Methodists—homosexuals, bisexuals, black and white, yellow and green, Mende, Temne...all of us, came together and said ‘it will happen.’” Yambasu ended his preaching with a vision of heaven. “When we all get to heaven, there will only be one question asked of us,” stated Bishop John K. Yambasu of the Sierra Leone Annual Conference gives the keynote address during the Africana banquet sponsored by BMCR. A UMNS photo by John C. Goodwin. Yambasu. “It will be, ‘did you spend your time on earth making it a better place?’” He said that our lives will be judged, not by the affiliations we have, but by how we spent the life that God gave us. Rev. Dr. Derrick Spiva is a clergy member of the California-Nevada Annual Conference and attends Bethany UMC in San Francisco. For the past 20 years, Spiva has been an entrepreneur developing and operating multi-million dollar projects in education and entertainment. Love Your Neighbor News Tuesday, May 1, 2012 Page 2 Dr. James Cone Points Us to Jesus; Sunday LYN Coalition Worship Restores Hope Love Your Neighbor Coalition Pledge by Lois McCullen Parr N early 1,000 worshipers gathered and sang “All are welcome…you’re invited to come and know God’s grace,” Sunday afternoon at the Love Your Neighbor Common Witness Coalition Worship at the Straz Center in Tampa, finding hope and inspiration in Scripture, prayer, song, church in a white-dominated society while lifting and exalting the voices and experiences of the oppressed,” said Cone, making the connections between the cross of Jesus, the lynching tree of 5,000 African Americans, and the fence of murdered Matthew Shepard. The Rev. Dr. James Cone preaches at the Common Witness Coalition’s “Love Your Neighbor” worship service on Sunday, April 29. Photo by Tom Cullens. dance, and a celebration of Holy Communion. “‘Love the sinner, hate the sin?’ Jesus never said that!” said Dr. James Cone emphatically – to a standing ovation and a Twitter explosion on #gc2012 and #gc12love. “I have spent a lifetime pointing out the hypocrisy and mendacity of the white Another 1,500 persons (live-streaming from six countries) viewed the webcast, hearing Cone say that he was going to “write theology like Louis Armstrong plays trumpet,” speaking from his experience of being Black in the U.S. Telling the congregation that each time he speaks, he is also speaking for his parents Lucy and Charlie Cone, who raised him in segregated Arkansas with “don’t you hate like they hate…hate kills the haters, not the hated,” the preacher-theologian raised the Christian call for love and liberation. Inspiring the worshipers who heard the story of the Good Samaritan, Cone said, “Hope comes by way of defeat, because suffering and death do not have the last word.” Many found Cone’s message an antidote to week one of the legislative sessions and “holy conferencing” on human sexuality. When Cone said “people who resist create hope and love for humanity,” shouts – and tweets – of “Amen!” filled the congregation. Cone said that those who resist an end to the discrimination of GLBTQ persons “are just as guilty as the ones who hung Blacks on trees and queer people on picket fences – just like Peter was silent when the Romans hung Jesus on the cross. “And God will delight when we are creators of justice and joy,” responded the congregation, led by Rev. DeLyn Celec, a lesbian ordained by Church Within a Church (www.cwac.us/) when The United Methodist Church discontinued her ordination process, and Mark Miller, the gay musician and lay delegate from New Jersey who began the #standwithmark witness that “when we are harmed, the church is harmed.” Rev. Lois McCullen Parr is a pastor at Broadway UMC in Chicago and a graduate of Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary. Delegates Face Two Choices to Help Palestine by Pam Bailey s delegates gather as a plenary to vote on church policies this week, two petitions will be presented that reflect opposing approaches to helping Palestinian Christians. The first is the approach Palestinian Christians themselves have asked for: divestment from companies that support the occupation. The second, from the Financial Administration Committee, calls only for boards and agencies to explore peacemaking strategies, including investment in Palestine, and “prayerfully consider advocating” that companies in which they invest sign principles on human rights. In the second option there is no requirement for any party to take any action. Action is what Palestinian Christians have requested from the church. Divestment will be offered in a “minority report.” It calls for specific, immediate action to end the ongoing occupation of A Palestinian land: divestment from Caterpillar, Hewlett Packard and Motorola Solutions. These companies manufacture equipment specifically for use by Israel’s military to maintain its occupation. United Methodist agencies have engaged with these three companies for several years, with no hope in sight that they will end their involvement in the violence and human rights abuses of the occupation. The right decision is very clear to Palestinian Christians. “It may shock you, but whenever there is a viable project identified in Palestine, we can raise the funds,” said Zahi Khouri, a Palestinian Christian and CEO of CocaCola Palestine. “We don’t need your financial help, your charity. What we need is to be able to operate freely. Divestment is the best, most immediate way that you can help us achieve that. We have been waiting for more than 40 years; we need action now.” Calendar of Events Tuesday, May 1, 2012 Wednesday, May 2, 2012 • Love Your Neighbor Lunch Speakers Series Garlinda Burton, Beauty Maenzanise, and Nehemia Allera. • Love Your Neighbor Lunch Speakers Series David Weekley, Transgender Extension Ministry • Daily Communion provided by Affirmation Officiant: Amy DeLong Location: The Tabernacle Time: 5:15 p.m. • Daily Communion is provided by Affirmation Officiants: Lyn Ellis and Laci Adams Location: The Tabernacle Time: 5:15 p.m. Time: 12 noon • General Board of Church and Society Dinner Speaker: Tony Campolo Location: Convention Center, Ballroom A Time: 5:00 - 7:30 p.m. (sold out) Khouri told delegates that “Palestinians have tried everything under the sun in terms of nonviolent resistance. We need the help of people around the world, and I am appealing to you as fellow Christians. Boycotts and divestment helped end apartheid in South Africa and it can help end the oppression of Palestinians.” In a statement issued last week, Desmond Tutu threw his own support behind the plea of Palestinian Christians. “If international courts and governments refuse to deal with this matter, we in the churches and in the rest of civil society really have no choice but to act,” wrote the bishop. “Both the Israelis and the Palestinians have to be liberated, but at this stage the greater onus is on the Israelis since they are the ones who are in power, economically, politically and militarily. ..I therefore wholeheartedly support your action to disinvest from companies who benefit from the occupation of Palestine.” The Rev. Alex Awad, dean of students WE PLEDGE TO make a just church our reality by: Working for racial justice and resisting exploitive systems that teach racial/ethnic superiority and inferiority. Building public expressions of inclusiveness and affirmations of diversity in our church and societies. Welcoming gender diversity and establishing policies and practices that share power across gender lines. Including Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender persons in our membership and ministry. Supporting seminaries, mission institutions and global partners in providing inclusive and shared leadership. Supporting the work with women, children, and youth by United Methodist Women and the Women’s Division. Seeking to honor and reconcile our differences, speaking respectfully with one another in love. Grounding our ministries in a broad understanding of church, community, environment, and world. Acting on reducing carbon, radiation, and other pollutants while refusing to give in to cynical despair. Documenting and announcing specific actions toward these commitments to encourage others. Living our Wesleyan tradition as people of the warmed heart, enlightened mind, and extended hand. Being United Methodists who embrace our unity in Christ, even in the midst of diverse opinions. Shaping our lives according to the good news of Jesus Christ, the Word of God made visible in our midst. at Bethlehem Bible College, testified to the committee: “We are fighting for the very survival of the Christians of the Holy Land. Israel won’t do the right thing without a ‘push’ from moral leaders like the United Methodist Church. When you support divestment, you support peace.” Pam Bailey is a United Methodist, freelance journalist, and founder of the Palestinian Gandhi Project. NEIGHBOR NEWS LOVE YOUR THE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE COMMON WITNESS COALITION • Affirmation Methodists for LGBTQ Concerns • Black Methodists for Church Renewal • Methodist Federation for Social Action • •National Federation of Asian American United Methodists • • Native American International Caucus • Reconciling Ministries Network • • United Methodist Association of Ministers with Disabilities • Love Your Neighbor News is produced by the Common Witness Coalition during General Conference 2012. Publisher Editor Managing Editor Contributing Editor Graphic Designer Assistant Publisher Ann Craig Erik Alsgaard Ben Roe M. Theresa Basile Jennifer L. Peterson David Braden Love Your Neighbor News is printed on recycled newsprint by Sun Publications, Lakeland, Fla. Page 3 Tuesday, May 1, 2012 Love Your Neighbor News Letter to an African Delgate by Jorge Lockward Dear brother, In your last e-mail you asked if there were any recommendations I would offer you regarding General Conference. Your request gives me the courage to share what is in my heart. I write to you as a friend, co-worker in God’s mission, and fellow delegate to the General Conference. As you know, the official position of The United Methodist Church regarding gay and lesbian persons has been one of the most painful issues the church has faced since the 1972 General Conference. I am attaching a compendium provided by United Methodist Communications of the General Conference actions on these matters since 1972. During my last visit to Harare, Zimbabwe, several African delegates spoke passionately on this issue. Listening to their concerns revealed two new insights to me that I would like to share with you. The first insight came as I realized the radically different place from where the matter is being observed and spoken about. The experience of the delegates who spoke seemed to be very limited in regards to homosexual persons. As far as I could tell, it did not include close relationships with Christian persons who are openly gay or lesbian. For example, when they used the words homosexual or gay, their words seemed to refer to an experience of persons in the margins of society. It is likely that none of them have the experience of being in spiri- Jorge Lockward. Photo courtesy of Religious Communicators Council speak on this matter without considering this crucial piece regarding the radical difference of our experiences. I am committed to keeping this in heart and mind in the future, particularly as we engage in holy conversation and joint discernment in Tampa. The second insight came to me when I heard a delegate speak passionately about the heritage received from the missionaries who evangelized Africa. His painful question was: How can you ask us now to change again and accept a new understanding of the Bible that differs from the one we received from the missionaries? The statement puzzled me, given that the same person is very anti-colonialist in his political views. At first I was tempted to dismiss these words as simple political manipulation. Yet, something within told me that there was more beyond the surface and that I needed to listen deeply in order to understand. The next day as I was having breakfast of these radically different understandings? The question is urgent as evidenced by the 501 to 417 vote in the last General Conference defeating the effort to change the posture of the UMC to one where we acknowledge our differences on this matter without condemning one another. As you probably know, our sister denominations, the Presbyterian Church USA and the Lutheran Church of America have recently found ways to live together in the midst of difference. When will the time come for the UMC? How are we to live into a common future, given the increased public polarization between a large portion of Africa where there is a hardening stance regarding homosexuality and a large portion of Western culture (and some third world countries) where rapid changes in the law are providing full rights to gay and lesbians persons. Even more urgent is the matter of how the church’s witness interacts with the violence perpetrated against gay and lesbian persons. I am sad to say that this is a very personal matter for me as recently a United Methodist friend in Kenya was almost killed because of suspicions in his community regarding his sexual orientation. He had to move to another city in order to survive. How can we, as United Methodists show the world a different way to deal with our differences, a way that goes beyond dismissal and division? Can we see how our witness contributes to the violence? I am afraid that right now we are not much of an How can we, as United Methodists, show the world a different way to deal with our differences, a way that goes beyond dismissal and division? -Jorge Lockward tual, church-related relationships with persons who are openly gay or lesbian. I could feel their struggle as they used these words (gay/lesbian), for, in their minds, and from their experience, they only reflect negative connotations. There is no negative judgment in this, since this is the reality they know. I assume that although they may know gay and lesbian persons in their families and churches, their sexual orientation is not openly spoken about, but is understood as a shameful secret or a struggle to be overcome. Again, there is no negative judgment in this, as it is only a reflection of the realities on the ground. On the other hand, for many United States delegates, myself included, the experience of this issue involves many relationships and friendships with faithful United Methodists who are openly gay or lesbian. Many of them are in loving and faithful relationships of many years and come to worship together. Some of them have an excellent track record of parenting well-adjusted children and grandchildren, who also come to worship with them. Some of them are our lay leaders, musicians, and worship leaders. A few of them are our pastors and district superintendents. These last categories require, of course, that the persons in question keep this aspect of their lives private, due to the current church law. The insight that came to me is how difficult it is to speak on this issue from such different experiences and perspectives and how unfair it is for us to ignore this. This new understanding led me to repent of my own unfairness when I would think or with a brother from Mozambique, I asked him about this question regarding the missionary heritage. As he spoke of the missionary experience in Africa, I started to understand a bit more of the complexity of the matter. I understood that Africans were asked by Christian missionaries to radically change their understanding of the world. This included letting go of the respect and veneration of ancestors and their ancient wisdom. It seems to me that perhaps the authority of the teachings of the missionaries filled the void created by the release of the old understanding, and became the new norm as the received wisdom. This means that these teachings are held deeply and are perhaps at the core of identity. The insight I received is that when it comes to this issue in Africa, we are facing more than just the contents of the issue itself, but also deeper issues of identity related to the radical changes of consciousness and understanding brought about by the colonization and “Christianization” of Africa. There are, of course, other important elements in the conversation around homosexuality, such as Biblical interpretation, a reasonable fear of the liberalization of society, concerns about the infiltration of the worst of Western culture, a concern for the reaction of others and the impact on evangelism should there be a change in the church’s posture, among others. I only shared the two insights above because they are new to me rising from my experience in Harare. Here are some questions that I ask myself: How are we to live together in the face example to the world. I don’t know what to do, but I have found three principles that I think may help us to find our way together. I share them now with you. The first is that above all things, I need to listen to the Holy Spirit. I need to listen to God’s Spirit above and beyond what I already think. This is easier said than done, for, after all, I am very convinced that my present beliefs have been provided the Holy Spirit! It will take a lot of humility to truly and honestly pray for discernment, and to be open to what the Spirit may have to say. This is particularly true as it comes to our understanding of the Bible. Since it was the Holy Spirit who inspired the Holy Scriptures, our only hope to understand the Bible is through that same Holy Spirit. God’s Spirit is, in my view, the only authority that can interpret the Bible faithfully to every age. The question I ask myself is: What is the Holy Spirit saying to the church at this moment? Whenever I come up with a quick answer to this question, I become aware of my own arrogance and lack of respect to the Holy Spirit and to the body of Christ. After all, how can I know where the Spirit of God is leading without my brothers and sisters who also have the Spirit? My concern is that, most of the time, we are not speaking “in the Spirit,” but from our own understandings. The Spirit of God has moved all of us into new understandings of the Bible in the span of our lives. This “moving toward perfection in love” is part and parcel of our Wesleyan heritage. I think that only honest, open and prolonged prayer and fasting will reveal to us what our endless debates and conversations have failed to show us. In fact, I fantasize often of a day of fasting at General Conference. I don’t know yet how this could be done, but I am committed to being ready for it and to engage it as an individual and with any others that may want to also do it. Imagine that… Second, I need to approach this matter from a place of deep respect for the Christianity of persons who hold different views than mine. I have experienced and have often been tempted into a subtle, unspoken attitude that does not acknowledge the core Christian identity of persons who hold an opposing view on this matter. Often I feel that we speak from the point of view that life would be easier, and the church and the world would be better if those who opposed our views would simply disappear. In this, we certainly do not treat each other as brothers and sisters. Also, we speak (from both sides), as if the issue was a simple matter of stubbornness, lack of understanding, or sinfulness from the other side. We fail to see it from the shoes of the other person, as we should, if we understood each other to be faithful Christians. The words Conservative and Liberal, or Progressive and Fundamentalist, have come to mean Christian and not Christian in the language, understanding and practice of many. Third, and last, I believe that we need to talk about this matter with increased openness. Again, this is easier said than done. On the surface, we have been talking about this for a long time in the church. Yet, in reality, there is a lot of fear in our hearts that does not allow us to truly speak and listen to each other. There is the fear (on both sides) that by simply listening deeply we may be entering a dangerous path that may lead to the destruction of all we hold dear and sacred. There is fear that if we speak honestly what we believe, we will hurt others and divide the church. There is fear of being rejected and dismissed. I am a good example of this last fear in my relationship with you. Although we have been friends for many years and collaborated on amazing projects for the glory of God, I think this is the first time that I speak honestly with you on this matter. On the back of my mind is the fear that speaking on this matter would have a negative influence on our capacity to be in ministry together and may even damage our friendship. Even as I write these lines, this fear is still with me, but I also hear the voice of the Spirit saying, “Fear not.” This fear is particularly present for gay and lesbian persons. In my visits to Africa, I have always encountered one or two faithful African gay or lesbian United Methodists who find the courage to speak to me once they find out that I am also one. I listen to their stories, cry with them and try to support them the best I can. Dear friend, I thank you for the opportunity to share these thoughts with you and look forward to your response and to our conversation. I want to offer myself for whatever way I can be of help to shed more light and understanding. Please know that the purpose of this email letter is not to convince, but to open a conversation that may lead toward a deeper discernment. Above all things, I want to understand your heart and the heart of the delegates of CI, for only in that understanding will we start to see the will of God for our beloved church. With gratitude for your friendship, ministry and listening ear, Jorge Lockward Jorge Lockward is a General Conference delegate from New York. Love Your Neighbor News Tuesday, May 1, 2012 Page 4 Lettre au délégué africain by Jorge Lockward 18 février 2012 Cher frère, Dans votre dernier e-mail vous a demandé s’il y avait des recommandations a vous offrir en ce qui concerne la Conférence générale. Votre demande m’encourage a partager avec vous ce que j’ai au cœur. Je vous écris comme a un ami, un collègue de travail en la mission pour Dieu et comme a un compatriote délégué à la Conférence générale. Comme vous le savez, la position officielle de l’UMC en ce qui concerne les personnes gaies et lesbiennes a été l’un des problèmes les plus douloureux que l’église fait face depuis la Conférence générale 1972. Je joins un recueil produit par des Communications des Méthodistes Unies des actions de la Conférence Générale sur ces sujets depuis 1972. Lors de ma dernière visite à Harare, au Zimbabwe, plusieurs délégués africains ont parlé avec passion sur cette question. En les écoutants, leurs préoccupations révéleraient deux nouvelles idées pour moi que je voudrais partager avec vous. Le premier aperçu viendrait comme je l’avais réalisé d’endroit radicalement différent des lieux où la question est observée et entretenue. L’expérience des délégués qui sont intervenus semblaient être très limitée en ce qui concerne les personnes homosexuelles. De loin je puis dire, qu’ils n’avaient pas inclus les chrétiens qui ont les relations étroites et ouvertes avec les gays ou lesbiennes. Par exemple, quand ils ont utilisé les mots homosexuel ou gay, leurs paroles semblaient se référer à une expérience de personnes en les marges de la société. Il est probable qu’aucun d’entre eux n’ait eu l’expérience d’être en esprit, dans des relations de l’Eglise liées aux personnes qui sont ouvertement gais ou lesbiennes. Je pouvais sentir leur lutte pendant qu’ils utilisaient ces mots (gay / lesbienne), dans leur esprit, et de leur expérience, ils ne reflètent que des connotations négatives. Il n’ya pas de jugement négatif à cela, puisque c’est la réalité qu’ils connaissent. Je suppose qu’ils peuvent même connaître des personnes gays et lesbiennes dans leurs familles et dans des églises, l’on ne parle pas ouvertement de leur orientation sexuelle, mais cela est considéré comme un secret honteux ou une lutte à surmonter. Encore une fois, il n’ya pas de jugement négatif dans ce domaine, car il n’est que le reflet des réalités sur le terrain. D’autre part, pour de nombreux délégués des États-Unis, y compris moi, l’expérience de cette question implique de nombreuses relations et d’amitiés avec les fidèles méthodistes unis qui sont ouvertement gays ou lesbiennes. Beaucoup d’entre eux sont dans des relations affectueuses et fidèles depuis de nombreuses années et viennent prier ensemble. Certains d’entre eux ont un excellent bilan de compétences parentales et bien adaptés aux enfants et petits-enfants, qui viennent aussi adorer Dieu avec eux. Certains d’entre eux sont nos dirigeants laïcs, des musiciens, et des leaders de culte. Quelques-uns d’entre eux sont nos pasteurs et surintendants de district. Ces dernières catégories de personnes exigent, bien sûr, que les personnes concernées gardent cet aspect de leur vie en privé, en raison de la loi actuelle église. L’idée qui m’est venue est au combien il est difficile de parler de cette question à partir de ces différentes expériences et points de vue et la façon dont il est injuste pour nous de l’ignorer. Cette nouvelle compréhension qui m’a amené à me repentir de mon iniquité quand je pense ou parle de cette question sans tenir compte de cette pièce cruciale en ce qui concerne la différence radicale de nos expériences. J’ai décidé de le garder au cœur et à l’esprit pour Jorge Lockward. Photo gracieuseté de Religious Communicators Council tandis que récemment un ami Méthodiste Uni au Kenya a failli être tué pour raison de soupçons par sa communauté de son orientation sexuelle. Il a dû déménager dans une autre ville afin de survivre. Comment pouvons-nous, entent que méthodistes unis montrer au monde une manière différente de traiter avec nos différences, une manière qui va au-delà du renvoi et la division? Pouvons-nous voir comment notre témoignage contribue à la violence? Je crains qu’à l’heure actuelle nous ne soyons pas un exemple pour le monde. Je ne sais pas quoi faire, mais j’ai trouvé trois(3) principes que je pense, peut nous aider à trouver ensemble notre chemin. Je les partage maintenant avec vous. La première est qu’au dessus de toutes choses, j’ai besoin d’écouter le Saint Esprit. J’ai besoin d’écouter l’Esprit de Dieu par dessus et au-delà ce que je pense maintenant. Cela est plus facile à dire qu’à faire, car, après tout, je suis très convaincu que mes croyances actuelles ont été fournies par le SaintEsprit! Il faudra beaucoup d’humilité pour véritablement et honnêtement prier pour le discernement, et être ouvert à ce que l’Esprit peut avoir à dire. Cela est particulièrement vrai en ce qui concerne notre compréhension de la Bible. Comme c’était le Saint-Esprit qui a inspiré les Saintes Ecritures, notre seul espoir de comprendre la Bible passe par ce même Esprit Saint. L’Esprit de Dieu est, à mon avis, la seule autorité capable d’interpréter la Bible fidèlement à tous les âges. La question que je me pose est: Que dit le Saint-Esprit à l’Église en ce moment? Chaque fois que je viens avec une réponse rapide à cette question, je prends conscience de ma propre arrogance et le manque de respect envers le Saint-Esprit et au corps du Christ. Après tout, comment puis-je savoir où l’Esprit de Dieu nous emmène sans mes frères et sœurs qui ont aussi l’Esprit? Ma préoccupation est que, la plupart du temps, nous ne parlons pas en “dans l’Esprit», mais à partir de nos propres compréhensions. L’Esprit de Dieu a transporte chacun de nous vers une nouvelle compréhension de la Bible en espace de nos vies. Ce “mouvement vers la perfection dans l’amour» fait partie intégrante de notre patrimoine Wesleyen. Je pense que c’est seulement par honnête, ouverte prière et jeûne prolongé qui nous révélera ce que nos interminables débats et les conversations n’ont pas réussi à nous montrer. En fait, je m’imagine souvent un jour de jeûne à la Conférence générale. Je ne sais pas encore comment cela pourra se passer, mais je suis prêt pour cela et très engagé en tant qu’individu a le faire, et avec tous ceux qui voudrons se joindre a moi. Imaginez que ... Deuxièmement, j’ai besoin d’aborder cette question avec un profond respect pour le christianisme des personnes qui ont des opinions différentes de la mienne. J’ai vécu et j’ai souvent été tenté dans un subtile, attitude non-dits qui ne reconnaît pas l’identité chrétienne fondamentale des personnes qui ont un point de vue opposé sur ce problème. Souvent, je pense que nous parlons du point de vue que la vie serait plus facile, et l’église et le monde seraient meilleur si ceux qui s’opposaient à notre l’avenir, comme nous nous engageons dans une sainte concertation et discernement commun à Tampa. La deuxième idée m’est venue lorsque j’ai entendu un délégué parlent avec passion de l’héritage reçu des missionnaires qui ont évangélisé l’Afrique. Sa douloureuse question était: Comment pouvez-vous nous demandez maintenant de changer de nouveau et d’accepter une nouvelle compréhension de la Bible qui diffère de celle que nous avons reçu des missionnaires? La déclaration me laisse perplexe, étant donné que la même personne est très anticolonialiste dans ses opinions politiques. Au début, j’étais tenté de rejeter ces mots comme une manipulation politique simple. Quelque chose en moi me disait qu’il y avait plus en profondeur qu’au-delà de la surface et que j’avais besoin de l’écouter attentivement pour le comprendre. Le lendemain, au petit déjeuner avec un frère du Mozambique, je lui ai demandé à propos de cette question concernant l’héritage des missionnaires. Comme il a parlé de l’expérience missionnaire en Afrique, j’ai commencé à comprendre un peu plus de la complexité de l’énigme. J’ai compris que les Africains ont été invités par les missionnaires chrétiens à changer radicalement leur compréhension du monde. Cela inclurait l’abandon du respect et de vénération des ancêtres et de leur sagesse ancestral. Il me semble peut-être que l’autorité des enseignements des missionnaires, a comblé le vide créé par la libération de l’ancienne vision, et est devenu la nouvelle norme de la sagesse reçue. Cela signifie que ces enseignements ont lieu en profondeur et sont peut-être au cœur de l’identité. L’idée que j’ai reçue est que quand il s’agit de ce problème en Afrique, nous sommes plus confrontés au contenu qu’a la question elle-même, mais aussi des problèmes plus profonds de l’identité liées aux changements radicaux de la conscience et de compréhension introduite par la colonisation et “ christianisation »de l’Afrique. Il y a bien sûr, d’autres éléments importants autour de la conversation sur l’homosexualité, telles que l’interprétation biblique, une crainte raisonnable de la libéralisation de la société, les préoccupations au sujet de l’infiltration de la pire de la culture occidentale, un sujet de préoccupation pour la réaction des autres et l’impact sur l’évangélisation devrait-il y avoir un changement de posture de l’église, entre autres. Je partage seulement les deux idées ci-dessus parce qu’ils sont nouveaux pour moi et viennent de mon expérience de Harare. Voici quelques questions que je me pose: Comment allons-nous vivre ensemble dans ces conceptions radicalement différentes? La question est urgente comme en témoigne le vote de 501 à 417 dans la dernière Conférence générale battant l’effort de changer la posture de l’UMC à une situation où nous reconnaissons nos différences à ce sujet sans condamner les uns les autres. Comme vous le savez probablement, nos confessions sœurs, l’Eglise presbytérienne des Etats-Unis et l’Eglise luthérienne d’Amérique ont récemment trouvé des façons de vivre ensemble dans le milieu de la différence. Quand sera le tour de l’UMC? Comment pouvons-nous vivre dans un avenir commun, où la polarisation publique croit entre une grande partie de l’Afrique où il y a un durcissement de position sur l’homosexualité et une grande partie de la culture occidentale (et certains pays du tiers-monde) où les changements rapides de la loi donnent tous les droits aux personnes gays et lesbiennes. Il est même plus urgente en la matière de savoir comment l’église témoigne les interactions avec la violence perpétrée contre les personnes gays et lesbiennes. Je suis triste de dire que c’est une affaire très personnelle point de vue disparaissaient tout simplement. En cela, nous n’avons certainement pas se traiter mutuellement comme des frères et sœurs. En outre, nous parlons (des deux côtés), comme si la question était une simple question d’entêtement, de manque de compréhension, ou de péché de l’autre côté. Nous n’arrivons pas à le voir partir des chaussures de l’autre personne, comme nous le devrions, si nous nous comprenions les uns des autres comme des fideles chrétiens. Les mots conservateurs et libéraux, progressistes et fondamentalistes viennent à signifier chrétienne et non chrétienne dans la langue, la compréhension et la pratique de bien d’autres. Troisième et dernier, je crois que nous avons besoin de parler de cette question avec une plus grande ouverture. Encore une fois, cela est plus facile à dire que de faire. Superficiellement, nous en parlions depuis très longtemps dans l’église. En réalité, il ya beaucoup de crainte dans nos cœurs qui ne nous permet pas de vraiment parler et d’écouter les uns aux autres. Il ya la peur (des deux côtés) que par simplement écouter attentivement les uns les autres, nous pourrions prendre dans une voie dangereuse qui peut conduire à la destruction de tout ce que nous chérissons et avons de sacré. Il est à craindre que si nous disons honnêtement ce que nous croyons, nous injurierions les autres et diviser l’église. Il y a la crainte d’être rejeté et repoussé. Je suis un bon exemple de cette dernière crainte dans ma relation avec vous. Bien que nous soyons amis depuis de nombreuses années et collaboré à des projets étonnants pour la gloire de Dieu, je pense que c’est la première fois que je parle franchement avec vous sur cette question. Au delà toute ma pensé, y est la peur de parler a ce sujet aurait une influence négative sur notre capacité à être ensemble dans le ministère et peut même endommager notre amitié. Même au moment où j’écris ces lignes, cette crainte est toujours avec moi, mais j’ai entendu la voix de l’Esprit qui, me disant: «Ne crains pas.” Cette crainte est particulièrement présente pour les personnes gays et lesbiennes. Lors de mes visites à l’Afrique, j’ai toujours rencontré un ou deux fidèles africains gays ou lesbiennes Méthodistes Unis qui ont le courage de me parler une fois qu’ils trouvent que je suis aussi l’un des leurs. J’écoute leurs histoires, je pleure avec eux et j’essaie de faire de mon mieux pour les aider. Cher ami, je vous remercie de l’opportunité que vous me donner de partager ces pensées avec vous. J’attends avec impatience votre réponse à notre conversation. Je veux m’offrir pour n’importe quel prix ; je veux être aidé à faire plus de lumière et de compréhension sur cette matière. S’il vous plaît, sachez que le but de cette lettre n’est pas de convaincre, mais d’ouvrir une conversation qui peut mener vers un meilleur discernement. Au-dessus de toutes choses, je veux entendre votre cœur parler, et le cœur d’autres délégués africains d’autant bien c’ est seulement par la compréhension que nous commencerons à voir la volonté de Dieu pour notre église bien-aimée. Avec toute ma gratitude pour notre amitié, le ministère et l’écoute, Jorge Lockward Jorge Lockward est un délégué de la Conférence de New York. Page 5 Tuesday, May 1, 2012 Love Your Neighbor News Barua ya wazi na Jorge Lockward Katika barua pepe uliyonitumia mwisho uliuliza kama kuna mapendekezo ningetaka kutoa kuhusu kongamano kuu. Swali lako linanipa ujasiri wa kuweza kukugawia yaliyo moyoni mwangu. Nina kuandikia kama rafiki, mfanyi kazi mweza katika kazi ya bwana na mjumbe katika kongamano kuu. Kama unavyojua msimamo wa dini la Methodist kuhusu mashoga ni mojawapo ya changamoto kubwa zaidi kuwahi kulikumba dini tangu kongamano kuu la mwaka wa 1972. Nimejumulisha habari kuhusu hatua zilizochukuliwa na dini kutoka wakati huo. Katika ziara yangu huko Harare Zimbabwe, nilikutana na wajumbe waliokuwa wamejawa na mapenzi wakinena kuhusu jambo hili. Walinipa maono tofauti ambayo ningetaka kukupa pia. Mwelekeo wa kwanza nilioupata ni baaada ya kutambua kuwa kuna tofauti sana ya mawazo kuhusu jambo hili la mashoga katika upande huu wa ulimwengu. Tajriba ya walionena ilionyesha kutoelewa kuhusu mashoga. Niliposikiza nuilielewa fika kuwa mtazamo wao haukuwajumulisha wakristo walio na uhusiano wa kishoga. Kwa mfano, walipotumia neno shoga halikuwa na maana ya wakristo bali wale walio nje ya jamii. Ilionyesha kuwa hakuna mtu aliye katika uhusiano wa kishoga katikati yao. Walikuwa na ugunmu kutaja maneno hayo kwani kwao yaliashiria maovu. Sikati kesi dhidi yao kwani hivyo ndivyo wanavyoelewa. Ninadhania kwamba ingawanje wanafahamu watu ambao ni mashoga au wasagaji katika jamii na makanisa zao jinsia yao haijadiliwi wazi, lakini inaeleweka kama siri yenye aibu ama kinyanganyiro ambacho lazima liepukwe. Hapa hukana kukata kesi pia, ni jinsi ilivyo huko mashinani. Katika upande mwingine, wajumbe wengi kutoka Marekani, nikiwemo kati yao tariba yetu ni kuwa maneno haya yana mwingiliano , uhusiano na urafiki katika waumini wa Methodist ambao ni wazi kuwa ni mashoga na wasagaji. Wengi wako katika uhusiano wenye mapenzi na uaminifu wa miaka minigi na hushirikiana katika ibada. Wengine wana historia njema ya malezi ya watoto na wajukuu wao, ambao pia huabudu pamoja. Wengine ni viongozi maarufu, waimbaji na viongozi wa kidini. Wachache kati yao ni wahubiri na viongozi wa wilaya. Kundi hili la mwisho linahitaji kuwa mambo haya yawe siri kulingana na sheria za kidini. Mtazamo nilio upata ni kuwa – ni vipi ilivyo vigumu kuoengea kuhusu jambo hili, kutokana na tajriba na mtazamo tofauti wao na jinsi ilivyo haramu sisi kupuuza neno hili. Kuelewa huku kulipelekea mimi kutubu kuhusu haramu yangu nilipofikiria au kunena juu ya jambo hili bila kuzingatia tofauti za kimsingi katika tajriba yetu. Ninajitolea kuweka haya moyoni na katika mawazo yangu siku za usoni hasa tunapojitayarisha kwa kongamano la Tampa. Mtazamo wa pili ulinikujia niliposikia mjumbe mmoja akinena kuhusu utamaduni walio upokea kutoka kwa wamisheni walioleta injili barani Afrika. Swali lake lenye uchungu ni – Jinsi gani sasa mnataka kulibadilisha tena funzo la Bibilia tulilopokea kutoka kwa wamishenari? Habari hii ilinishangaza sana, ikizingatiwa kuwa jamaa huyu ana mtazamo mkali wa kisiasa dhidi ya ukoloni. Mwanzo nilidhani kuwa haya yalikuwa tu ni matokeo ya siasa mbaya, lakini wazo likanijia na kunionyesha kuwa kulikuwa na mengi wala sio tu yale niliyoyadhania. Nilihitaji kusikiza vyema ili kuelewa. Siku iliyofuatia nikila kiamsha kinywa na ndigu mmoja kutoka Msumbiji. Nilimuuliza swali hili kuhusu utamaduni wa wamishenari. Aliponena kuhusu wamishenari barani Afrika, nilianza kuelewa jinsi jambo hili lilikuwa lenye uzito mwingi. Nilielewa fika kuwa wamishenari waliwau- Jorge Lockward. Picha kwa hisani ya kidini mawasiliano Baraza. liza WaAfrika kubadilisha mtazamo wa ulimwengu. Hii ni pamoja na heshima na hekima ya mababu zao. Ilienekana kwangu kuwa mafunzo haya ndiyo yaliyopelekea mtazamo wao na hekima mpya waliyoipokea. Hii inamaanisha kuwa mafunzo haya yako katika mizizi yao na wanajitabulisha nayo. Mtazamo nilioupata nikuwa- Jambo hili linapoangaziwa barani Afrika, kuna changamoto zaidi ya yaliyomo bali pia utambulisho wa jamii ulipelekewa na mabadiliko ya kimsingi kutokana na ukoloni na uenezaji injili barani Afrika. Bila shaka kuna vigezo muhimu katika mjadala huu wa mashoga kama vile tasfri ya Bibilia. Uwoga wa utandawazi wa jamii, kuenea kwa mila mbaya za Kizungu, uwoga dhidi ya matokeo ya uinjilisti ikiwa dini litabadilisha msimamo wake kati ya mengineyo. Nimenena kuhusu mitazamo hiyo miwili pekee niliyoipata Harare Kwa ajili ni mpya na sijayashuhudia tena. Baaadhi ya maswali ninayojiuliza ni : Tutaishi vipi pamoja tukiwa na mitazamo tofauti kimsingi? Swali hili ni la dharura kama ilivyoshuhudiwa katika kongamano kuu ambapo kulikuwa na nia ya kuubadilisha msimamo wa dini la Methodist ili kukubali kuwa kuna tofauti baina yetu bila kuwakemea. Upande uliokuwa ukiupinga mjadala huu uliibuka na ushidi wa kura 501 dhidi ya 417 kwa wale waliouunga mkono. Kama mnavyofahamu madhehebu tunayoshirikiana nayo kwa karibu , lile la Presbyterian na Lutheran huko Marekani wamepata jinsi ya kuishi pamoja licha ya tofauti zao. Wakati wa Methodist utafika lini? Tutaishi vipi tukiwa pamoja siku zijazo, haswa ikizingatiwa pengo kuu lililo kati ya mtazamo wa ki Afrika ambapo kuna ugumu zaidi kuhusu ushoga, na ule wa Kizungu. Hii ni pamoja na nchi zinazoendelea ambazo zimeweka sheria zinazo walinda mashoga na wasagaji. Jambo la dharura tena sana ni jinsi dini linashughulikia ghasia dhidi ya mashoga na wasagaji. Nina kiri ingawa kwa hasira kuwa jambo hili lina nihusu sana. Hivi karibuni rafiki mmoja wa Methodist alinusurika kifo baada ya jamii nakoishi kugundua hali yake ya kinjinsia. Ilimbidi ahamie mji tofauti ili kuokoa maisha yake. Vipi basi sisi kama waMethodisti tunavyoweza kuonyesha ulimwengu hali ya kuishi pamoja licha ya tofauti zetu, kwa njia inayokiuka mipaka yote? Tunaweza kuona jinsi shahidi wetu anavyochangia katika vurumai hizi? Naogopa kuwa kwa wakati huu hatuna mfano mwema katika ulimwengu. Sijui la kufanya, lakini ninazo kauli tatu ambazo nafikiri huenda zikatusaidia kupata mwelekeo mmmoja. Ndizo hizi nawapa sasa. Muhumu sana ni kuwa nahitaji kumsikiza roho mtakatifu. Nahitaji kumsikiza raho wa Bwana na zaidi ya ninayofikiria. Ni rahisi kusema kuliko kutenda haya, kwani nimeshawishika kuwa ninaloamini sasa ni kutokana na roho mtakatifu. Inagharimu unyenyekevu mwingi ili niweze kuomba kuwa niwe na mawazo wazo kumsikiza roho mtakatufu anaponena. Hili ni kweli hasa inpozingatiwa jinsi tunaielewa Bibilia. Ni roho mtakatifu aliye jaza upako maandishi takatifu, hivyo basi kuelewa kwetu sisi hata sasa kwa tegemea huyo roho mtakatifu. Roho wa Mungu ndiye pekee anayeweza kutafsiri Bibilia kwa njia inayofaa kulingana na maoni yangu. Swali ninalojiuliza ni nje: Roho mtakatifu anasema nini wakati huu kwa kanisa? Kila ninapoubua jawabu la haraka kwa swali hili, mimi huelewa jinsi ninvyomkosea heshima roho mtakatufu and mwili wa Kristo. Ni vipi basi nivyoweza kujua mahali Roho wa Mungu anapoelekea bila ndugu na dada zangu ambao pia wako katika Roho? Linalo nitia wasiwasi, ni kuwa wakati mwingi hatusemi kiroho ila jinsi tunavyoelewa. Roho wa Mungu ametuelekeza sisi wote kuelewa upya Bibilia maishani mwetu. Mwelekeo huu kuhusu upendo ni kiungo muhimu cha itikadi ya Wesley. Nafikiri kuwa ni maombi ya ukweli, uwazi na kufunga ambayo yatatuelekeza kuelewa yale ambayo mijadala na mazungumzo yetu yamekosa kuashiria. Ukweli ni kuna wakati utakaofika katika kongamano kuu ambapo wajumbe watafunga kwa maombi- licha ya kuwa hili ni ndoto tu. Na ahidi kuwa niko tayari kufanya lolote ili kuafikia lengo hili pamoja na wengine walio na maoni sawa. Tafakari hayo! Pili, nafaa kuliangazia swala hili nikiwa na heshima kuu kwa Wakristo wenye maoni tofauti na yangu. Nimepitia wakati mgumu wenye kujaribiwa kupuuza wakristo wengine wenye maoni tofauti. Wakati mwingi nahisi kuwa tunaongea kwa mtazamo kuwa maisha yangekuwa rahisi, kanisa na ulimwengu zingekuwa njema, hasa kama wale wenye maoni tofauti na yetu hawangekuwepo. Hapa bila shaka hatuwachukulii kama ndugu na dada zetu. Tunanena pia bila msimamo, ni kana kwamba jambo hili ni rahisi na la kusumbua, kukosa kuelewa, au uzinifu wa walio upande mwingine. Tunakosa kuona jambo hili jinsi wenzetu wanavyolitazama licha ya kuwa ni wakristo kama sisi tunaofaa kuelewana bila tatizo lolote. Maneno kama vile wahifadhi, watandawazi au wenye misingi ya maendeleo yamepata maana ya Kikristo ila sio kwa lugha, maelewano au hata matendo. La tatu, na la mwisho naamini kuwa, tunahitaji kuongea juu ya jambo hili kwa uwazi zaidi. Tena, hili ni rahisi kusema kuliko kutenda. Kwa juu, tumekuwa tukisema jambo hili kwa muda mrefu kanisani. Lakini ukweli wa mambo ni kuwa kuna uwoga mwingi katika nyoyo zetu ambao unatuzuia kunena na kusikizana wenyewe. Kuna uwoga pande zote mbili kuwa kusikizana kutatuingiza katika njia ya uharibifu wa yale tunayoyadhamini na kuyaona takatifu. Huu ni uwoga kuwa tukinena kwa kweli kuhusu tunayoamini, tutawakera wengine na kugawanya kanisa. Huu ni uwoga wa kuogopa kukataliwa au kufukuzwa. Mimi ni mfano mwema katika uhusiano wangu nanyi mwaka uliopita. Hata ingawa tumekuwa marafiki kwa muda mrefu na kushirikiana nanyi katika miradi tofauti ya maajabu kwa ajili ya utukufu wa bwana, nafikiri hii ni mara ya kwanza na nena kwa ukweli nanyi kuhusu jambo hili. Katika mawazo yangu nahofia kuwa kunena hivi kuhusu jambo hili huenda kukaathiri uwezo wetu wa kuwa katika huduma pamoja na pia likaharibu urafiki wetu. Hata ninapoandika mistari hii, uwoga huu bado uko ndani yangu. Lakini pia nasikia sauti ya Roho ikinena “Usiogope.” Uwoga huu ni mwingi hasa katika wasenge na wasagaji. Katika ziara yangu Afrika nimekutana na muumini mmoja au wawili wanaokiri ni wasenge au wasagaji wanaopata ujasiri wa kunena nami wanapotambua kuwa mimi pia ni mmoja wao. Mimi huwasikiliza , hulia nao na pia kuwaunga mkono wanapohitaji. Rafiki mpendwa, nashukuru kwa nafasi hii ya kuweza kushirikiana mawazo haya nanyi. Natarajia kuwa nitayapata majibu yenu na mazungumzo baina yetu. Najotolea kwa vyovyote vile ninavyoweza ku- saidia kuwafafanulia mawazo haya. Ningetaka pia muelewe kuwa sababu ya barua hii pepe, sio kuwashawishi ila kufungua mazungumzo na kuletea utambuzi zaidi na kuelewa. Juu ya yote hayo, ningetaka kuelewa nyoyo zenu na za wajumbe wa CI, kwani kuelewa huku ndiko pekee kutatufanya kuona nia ya Mungu kwa kanisa letu. Ni mimi wenu mwenye shukrani ya urafiki, huduma na ninaowapa sikio langu. Jorge Lockward Jorge Lockward ni Mkuu wa Mkutano wa Mjumbe kutoka New York. Love Your Neighbor News Tuesday, May 1, 2012 Page 6 Carta à un representante à Conferencia Geral por Jorge Lockward 18 de fevereiro de 2012 Amado irmão, Em seu último e-mail que você perguntou se havia alguma recomendação que eu poderia oferecer-lhe a respeito da Conferência Geral. O seu pedido me dá a coragem de compartilhar o que está em meu coração. Escrevo como um amigo, colega de trabalho na missão de Deus e como companheiro e representante à Conferência Geral. Como você sabe, a posição oficial da UMC sobre pessoas gays e lésbicas tem sido uma das questões mais dolorosas a igreja tem enfrentado desde a Conferência Geral de 1972. Estou anexando um compêndio fornecido pela Secretaría Metodista de Comunicação das ações da Conferência Geral sobre estas matérias desde 1972. Durante minha última visita a Harare, Zimbabwe, vários delegados africanos falaram apaixonadamente sobre esta questão. As suas preocupações revelaram duas novas preocupacoes para mim, e que eu gostaria de compartilhar contigo. A primeira preocupação veio quando eu percebi o lugar radicalmente diferente de onde o assunto está sendo observado e falado. A experiência dos delegados que falaram pareciam ser muito limitada em relação aos homossexuais. Tanto quanto eu poderia dizer, que não incluem relacionamentos íntimos com pessoas cristãs que são abertamente gay ou lésbica. Por exemplo, quando eles usaram as palavras homossexual ou gay, suas palavras pareciam referir-se a uma experiência de pessoas nas margens da sociedade. É provável que nenhum deles tem a experiência de estar em espiritualmente, ligadas à Igreja e relacionamentos com pessoas que são abertamente gay ou lésbica. Eu podia sentir sua luta em que usou essas palavras (gay / lésbica), para, em suas mentes, e de sua experiência, eles apenas refletem conotações negativas. Não há julgamento negativo neste, uma vez que esta é a realidade que eles conhecem. Presumo que, embora possam conhecer pessoas gays e lésbicas em suas famílias e igrejas, a sua orientação sexual não é falada abertamente, mas é entendida como um segredo vergonhoso ou uma luta a ser superada. Novamente, não há nenhum juízo negativo nisso, pois é apenas um reflexo das realidades em nossas comunidades. Por outro lado, para muitos delegados dos Estados Unidos, inclusive eu, a experiência desta questão envolve muitos relacionamentos e amizades com os fiéis metodistas unidos que são abertamente gays ou lésbicas. Muitos deles estão em relacionamentos amorosos e fiéis de muitos anos e viemos para adorar a Deus juntos. Alguns deles têm um excelente histórico de pais bem ajustados filhos e netos, que também vêm adorar a Deus com eles. Alguns deles são nossos líderes leigos, músicos e líderes de louvor. Alguns deles são nossos pastores e superintendentes distritais. Estas últimas categorias exigem, naturalmente, que as pessoas em questão devem manter esse aspecto de suas vidas privadas, devido à lei da igreja atual. A percepção de que veio para mim é que como é difícil falar sobre esta questão a partir de tais experiências e perspectivas diferentes e quão injusto é para nós ignorarmos isso. Esta nova compreensão levou-me a arrepender da minha própria injustiça quando eu ia pensar ou falar sobre este assunto sem considerar esta peça crucial a respeito da diferença radical de nossas experiências. Estou empenhado em manter isso em mente e coração no futuro, especialmente no que se envolver em santidade e discernimento conjunto em Tampa. A segunda preocupação veio a mim quando ouvi um delegado falar apaixonadamente sobre a herança recebida dos missionários que evangelizaram África. Jorge Lockward. Foto cedida pelo Conselho Religioso Comunicadores. Sua dolorosa questão era: Como você pode pedir-nos agora para mudar novamente e aceitar uma nova compreensão da Bíblia, que é diferente do que recebemos dos missionários? A declaração me deixou perplexo, uma vez que a mesma pessoa é muito anti-colonialista em seus pontos de vista políticos. No começo eu estava tentado descartar estas palavras como manipulação política simples. No entanto, algo dentro me disse que havia mais além da superfície e que eu precisava escutar profundamente para entender. No dia seguinte, eu estava tomando café da manhã com um irmão de Moçambique, eu perguntei a ele sobre essa questão em relação à herança missionária. Enquanto ele falava da experiência missionária na África, comecei a entender um pouco mais da complexidade da questão. Eu entendi que os africanos foram convidados pelos missionários cristãos para mudar radicalmente a sua compreensão do mundo. Isto incluiu o desapego do respeito e veneração aos antepassados e da sua sabedoria antiga. Me parece que talvez a autoridade dos ensinamentos dos missionários, preencheu o vazio criado pela liberação do entendimento de idade, e tornou-se a nova norma como a sabedoria recebida. Isto significa que estes ensinamentos são mantidos profundamente e são, talvez, no núcleo de identidade. A visão que eu recebi é que quando se trata deste assunto na África, estamos diante de mais do que apenas o conteúdo do tema em si, mas também questões mais profundas da identidade relacionada com as mudanças radicais de consciência e compreensão trazidas pela colonização e “ cristianização “da África. Há, naturalmente, outros elementos importantes para a conversa em torno da homossexualidade, como a interpretação bíblica, um medo razoável de liberalização da sociedade, a preocupação com a infiltração do pior da cultura ocidental, uma preocupação com a reação dos outros e do impacto sobre evangelismo deve haver uma mudança na postura da Igreja, entre outros. Eu só partilhado as duas idéias acima, porque elas são novas para mim aumentando a minha experiência em Harare. Aqui estão algumas coisas que eu me pergunto: Como estamos vivendo juntos em face desses entendimentos radicalmente diferentes? A questão é urgente como evidenciado pelo voto 501-417 na última Conferência Geral derrotar o esforço para mudar a postura da UMC para outro em que reconheçamos nossas diferenças sobre este assunto sem condenar o outro. Como você provavelmente sabe, denominações irmãs, como a Igreja Presbiteriana dos EUA e da Igreja Luterana da América têm encontrado recentemente maneiras de viver juntos em meio à diferença. Quando será que a hora chegará para a UMC? Como podemos viver em um futuro comum, dada a crescente polarização entre público uma grande parte da África, onde há um endurecimento em relação a homossexualidade postura e uma grande parte da cultura ocidental (e em alguns países do terceiro mundo) onde rápidas mudanças na lei são fornecimento de plenos direitos para gays e lésbicas pessoas? Ainda mais urgente é a questão de como o testemunho da igreja interage com a violência perpetrada contra as pessoas gays e lésbicas. Estou triste em dizer que esta é uma questão muito pessoal para mim, como recentemente um amigo Metodista Unido no Quênia foi quase morto por causa de suspeitas de sua comunidade á respeito de sua orientação sexual. Ele teve que se mudar para outra cidade, a fim de sobreviver. Como podemos, como Metodistas Unidos, mostrar ao mundo uma maneira diferente de lidar com nossas diferenças, de modo que vá além da demissão e divisão? Podemos ver como o nosso testemunho contribui para a violência? Tenho medo de que agora nós não sejamos um exemplo muito bom para o mundo. Eu não sei o que fazer, mas eu encontrei 3 princípios que eu acho que pode nos ajudar a encontrar o nosso caminho juntos. Eu quero compartilhar com você. A primeira é que acima de tudo, eu preciso ouvir o Espírito Santo. Eu preciso ouvir o Espírito de Deus acima e além do que eu já penso. Isto é mais fácil dizer do que fazer, pois, afinal, estou muito convencido de que minhas crenças atuais têm sido, desde que o Espírito Santo! Vai ter um monte de humildade para a honestidade e sinceridade, orar por discernimento, e estar aberto para que o Espírito possa ter a dizer. Isto é particularmente verdade de acordo com a nossa compreensão da Bíblia. Desde que foi o Espírito Santo que inspirou a Sagrada Escritura, a nossa única esperança de entender a Bíblia é através desse mesmo Espírito Santo. Espírito de Deus é, na minha opinião, a única autoridade que pode interpretar a Bíblia fielmente a todas as idades. A pergunta que me faço é: Que é que o Espírito Santo está dizendo à igreja neste momento? Sempre que eu venho com uma resposta rápida para essa questão, eu me torno consciente da minha própria arrogância e falta de respeito ao Espírito Santo e para o corpo de Cristo. Afinal, como posso saber onde está o Espírito de Deus conduzindo meus irmãos e irmãs que também têm o Espírito? Minha preocupação é que, na maioria das vezes, não estamos falando “no Espírito”, mas a partir de nosso próprio entendimento. O Espírito de Deus se moveu em todos nós e novos entendimentos da Bíblia apareceram de acordo com nossas experiências. Este “movimento em direção à perfeição no amor” é parte integrante de nossa herança Wesleyana. Acho que só a oração honesta, aberta e prolongado jejum e vai revelar-nos que os nossos intermináveis debates e conversas falharam em mostrar-nos. Na verdade, eu fantasio muitas vezes com um dia de jejum na Conferência Geral. Eu não sei ainda como isso poderia ser feito, mas eu me comprometo a estar pronto para ele e para acoplá-lo como um indivíduo e com quaisquer outros que queiram também fazer isso. Imagine que ... Em segundo lugar, eu preciso abordar esta questão de um lugar de profundo respeito pelo cristianismo de pessoas que têm visões diferentes da minha. Eu experimentei e muitas vezes têm sido tentados em uma atitude sutil, silenciosa, que não reconhece a identidade cristã e núcleo de pessoas que possuem uma visão contrária sobre o assunto. Muitas vezes eu sinto que falamos a partir do ponto de vista de que a vida seria mais fácil, e a igreja e o mundo seriam melhores se aqueles que se oponem às nossas opiniões iriam simplesmente desaparecer. Neste caso, nós certamente não tratamos uns aos outros como irmãos e irmãs. Além disso, falamos (de ambos os lados), como se o problema fosse uma simples questão de teimosia, falta de compreensão, ou pecado do outro lado. Nós não conseguimos vê-lo a pele de outra pessoa, como deveríamos, se entendemos uns aos outros para sermos cristãos fiéis. As palavras Conservador e Liberal, ou Progressivo e fundamentalista têm vindo a dizer cristão e não cristão na língua, a compreensão e a prática de muitos. Terceiro, e último, acredito que precisamos falar sobre este assunto com maior abertura. Novamente, isso é mais fácil dizer do que fazer. Na superfície, temos falado sobre isso por um longo tempo na igreja. No entanto, na realidade, há muito medo em nossos corações que não nos permite realmente falar e ouvir uns aos outros. Há o medo (em ambos os lados) que simplesmente escutar profundamente podemos estar entrando em um caminho perigoso que pode levar à destruição de tudo o que prezamos e sagrado. Não é o medo que se falar honestamente o que acreditamos, vamos ferir aos outros e dividir a igreja. Há medo de ser rejeitado e demitido. Eu sou um bom exemplo desse medo passado na minha relação contigo. Embora tenhamos sido amigos por muitos anos e colaborado em projetos incríveis para a glória de Deus, acho que esta é a primeira vez que eu falo honestamente contigo sobre este assunto. Na parte de trás da minha mente é o medo de que falar sobre este assunto teria uma influência negativa sobre a nossa capacidade de estar no ministério em conjunto e podem até prejudicar a nossa amizade. Mesmo enquanto escrevo estas linhas, este medo ainda está comigo, mas eu também ouço a voz do Espírito dizendo: “não temas”. Este medo está particularmente presente para as pessoas gays e lésbicas. Em minhas visitas à África, eu sempre encontrava um ou dois fiéis Africanos gays ou lésbica Metodistas Unidas que encontram a coragem de me contar, uma vez que descobrem que eu também sou um. Eu ouço suas histórias, choro com eles e tento apoiá-los o melhor que posso. Caro amigo, eu te agradeço pela oportunidade de compartilhar esses pensamentos com você e aguardamos a sua resposta para a nossa conversa. Eu quero oferecerme de qualquer maneira que eu possa ser de ajuda para lançar mais luz e entendimento. Por favor, saibam que o objetivo desta carta e-mail não é convencer, mas para abrir uma conversa que possa levar adiante a um profundo discernimento. Acima de tudo, eu quero entender o seu coração e o coração de outros delegados africanos, porque apenas nesse entendimento, é que vamos começar a ver a vontade de Deus para a nossa amada Igreja. Com gratidão por sua amizade ministério, e ouvido atento, Jorge Lockward Jorge Lockward é UM delegado da Conferência Geral de Nova York. Page 7 Tuesday, May 1, 2012 Reconciling Communities Top 500 on 40th Anniversary of “Incompatibility” Policy O n the 40th anniversary of the policy that states that “homosexuality is incompatible with Christian teaching”, the number of United Methodist communities to publically state their welcome of people of all sexual orientations and gender identities has passed an important milestone. Reconciling communities, those who have made an explicit welcome of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people, now number over 500. The anniversary and the milestone both occurred while The United Methodist Church meets in General Conference to debate the inclusion of LGBT people in the life of the church. Both Madras United Methodist Church of Madras, Oregon, and Aldersgate United Methodist Church of Chapel Hill, NC approved statements that specifically name a welcome of people of all sexual orientations and gender identities. These statements were received by the staff of Reconciling Ministries Network during the first week of The United Methodist General Conference. Aldersgate United Methodist Church had been using reconciling language for many years, but had never submitted the language to Reconciling Ministries Network until now. “We had been living it out, but not been very public for years,” said Lyn Koehnline, a member of the congregation. “The proposed North Carolina constitutional amendment banning marriage equality prompted the church to be more public about its welcome.” “Reaching 500 Reconciling Communities during both General Conference and the 40th anniversary of the ‘incompatible’ language is a significant sign,” said Rachel Harvey, Associate Executive Director of Reconciling Ministries Network. “Clearly, there is growing desire among United Methodists to provide ministry to all of God’s children. We continue to pray that The United Methodist Church will recognize that the harmful policies of exclusion that have burdened the church for 40 years need to be eliminated.” As soon as the 500 milestone was reached, it was exceeded. Even while General Conference continues, more reconciling statements are coming in. Two more Reconciling Communities have already been added, Grace United Methodist Church of Lake Bluff, Ill. and Stone Village Church in Columbus, Ohio. To date, 503 Churches, Sunday School classes, United Methodist Women Units, campus ministries, and annual conference groups have strengthened the Reconciling Ministries Network through their witness for a fully inclusive church. The United Methodist Church is meeting in General Conference April 24-May 4. Reconciling Ministries Network is working in coalition with several organizations to ensure membership, remove barriers to ordination, and advance marriage equality for people of all sexual orientations and gender identities. Love Your Neighbor News ‘Wilderness’ is All Around Us by Chett Pritchett W ilderness is an experience of biblical proportions. Whether it is the 40 years of saying gay and lesbian people are “incompatible with Christian teaching,” the suffering of immigrants, or systems of poverty, the Methodist Federation for Social Action (MFSA) has sought to be a voice in the wilderness for people and places on the margins of church and society. As an independent voice, MFSA focuses on peace, poverty, people’s rights, progressive issues, and justice within The United Methodist Church. At the MFSA “Out of the Wilderness” reception last Saturday evening, MFSA leaders reflected on the variety of wilderness experiences. Board Co-Presidents, Tara Thronson and Vicki Woods, welcomed those gathered and offered an opportunity for people to connect with one another, meet Board members and staff, and encouraged their work that supports people on the margins. David Hosey of Dumbarton United Methodist Church in Washington, D.C. spoke of his experience on a BorderLinks trip that was sponsored by OnFire, MFSA’s Young Adult Chapter. He met with workers and newly arrived migrants, government and immigration enforcement officials on both sides of the border, and business people in the maquiladora sector, noting that participants on the trip were challenged to reexamine their own assumptions and beliefs. “By experiencing first-hand life in communities like Nogales, Sonora, we are able to wrestle with the complexity of life on the border,” Hosey said. The reception also celebrated the work of the MFSA’s Young Adult Scholarship and Sponsorship recipients. Sixteen young adults were selected to serve in leadership roles with the Common Witness Coalition. By working with mentors, scholars are learning how to track legislation and plan logistics for hospitality. “Being a scholarship recipient allowed me to come to General Conference and see the legislative process from beginning to end,” said the Rev. Justin White of Wells UMC in Jackson, Miss. “I look forward to helping mentor other young adults in 2016.” ‘I’m tired of hearing that young adults are the future of the Church,” said Jill A. Warren, Executive Director of the Federation. “They are the Church here and now. MFSA is proud to have sponsored their participation at General Conference.” Chett Pritchett is the Development and Communications Associate at Methodist Federation for Social Action. A graduate of Wesley Theological Seminary, he serves as Lay Leader at Dumbarton United Methodist Church in Washington, DC. Don Hayashi, NFAAUM Coalition Member, Says Inclusion Begins with Hospitality by Lois Parr “It was a no-brainer,” said Don Hayashi about the National Federation of Asian American United Methodists joining the LYN Coalition. “We believe in justice and inclusion,” continued Hayashi, “in part because we have been victims of being left out, overlooked. “To reach out to other constituencies that have also been harmed starts with hospitality,” the Federation President says. “If we are to be the Church of Jesus Christ reaching out to all, we need to hear and be in relationship with all.” persons who are LGBT,” says Hayashi, “but we had not thought of this issue for a workshop...it was a revelation that we could talk about this together.” The Federation draws together the diverse ethnic groups even though the needs of the Asian American community are quite varied. Hayashi says some families have been in the United States for many generations, and some are newly arrived; some are living in urban centers, while others are in obscure areas. But, says Hayashi, it’s important for the different ethnic groups Don Hayashi, John Oda, and Sylvia Phon. Photo by Lois McCullen Parr. The Federation is made up of 10 subethnic groups: Cambodian, Chinese, Filipino, Formosan, Hmong, Japanese, Korean, Laotian, South Asian, and Vietnamese; as well as 15 languages. Its mission is to encourage full participation of Asian American United Methodists in all aspects of the life of the Church. Hayashi explains that a couple years ago for the Federation’s National Conference, two women requested a workshop on acceptance of lesbian and gays in the church. “Regardless of ancestry group, there are to identify together “so that we have voice and visibility.” NFAAUM supports not only the legislation for full LGBTQ inclusion but also the MFSA plan for the denomination’s restructuring. “We’re very concerned about the CTA and IOT proposals which would eliminate the General Commissions on Religion and Race, and Status and Role of Women. We know that over the years it’s been very important to have groups who help the church be the church,” he said. Women and racial/ethnic groups are often overlooked, says Hayashi, who has worked for the General Church. “These are the people we need to help the Church to grow,” he says, “and to develop new leadership.” One such young leader, Sylvia Phon, is with NFAAUM in her first GC experience. As an observer and monitor, Phon is moved by the opportunity to learn about the church and to discover more profoundly God’s call on her own life. “I did not think that coming here would relate to me personally,” Phon says, “but I’m discovering that God is speaking to me through the many elders who are here. As a Cambodian, I’ve had to learn to overcome the past lack of acceptance of women.” Phon says within her own ethnic group, she felt disadvantaged as a woman, but being at General Conference has helped her to “gain strength to express how God is speaking to me.” Phon says that the encouragement she has from her mentors from all over the U.S. has given her the courage to say that “outloud!” Hayashi beams as Phon says that next GC she’ll bring other women and young people, because this kind of leadership development is one of the goals of NFAAUM. “While there is a thirst for ministry and places to worship among Asian Americans,” says Hayashi, the church also functions as a center of community. The hospitality that is culturally significant serves as a way to care of people’s physical and social needs – and that’s the meal served after worship as a sign of welcome. Hayashi says that many Asian Americans know of our denomination because of the work of UMCOR, and the hospitality they experienced as refugees or in other ministries led them to seek out UM congregations. “There’s a great story told of a Cambodian Chief who did this,” he tells, “who went up to the preacher after worship and said ‘I want to join your church and so do all my people.’ “It’s told that the pastor had to call the DS to see if it was legal,” he laughs, even as he names the pain that attends the history of immigration for Asian Americans in the U.S. “Immigration isn’t only a Hispanic/Latino issue,” he says, “as many Asian American congregations have persons who have had challenges.” The history of Asian immigration in the U.S. has been filled with exclusion and rejection, which is what makes hospitality such a powerful way to extend the love of Christ. “It’s natural to have NFAAUM and all our other Coalition partners together,” says Rev. John Oda, former RMN Board Chairperson, “because they are communities that have been disenfranchised historically over the years.” Oda speaks painfully of the Service of Repentance held Friday evening. “When is the Church going to repent of the pain it’s caused other communities, including the LGBT community?” “It’s recognizing the past and that there is pain,” says Hayashi, “and that we need to be in ministry to that pain.” Our witness is affecting the delegates, he asserts, “making them more aware of something that they’ve been unable to speak about.” The Coalition witness is respectful and hospitable, he says, “and hospitality goes a long way toward opening doors. “It’s when we get to know each other that we can relate and then know that God makes all of us, just in different ways,” concluded Hayashi. “LYN is doing this.” Rev. Lois McCullen Parr is a pastor at Broadway UMC in Chicago and a graduate of Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary. Love Your Neighbor News Tuesday, May 1, 2012 Page 8 love makes a family I know a lot of you are feeling in that dark place because religion and religious people are telling you that you are an abomination before God. Maybe you are growing up in a Roman Catholic household and you hear from your church that you are intrinsically disordered. Or maybe you are growing up in a Mormon household or a Southern Baptist household, and you’re told that that somehow your life is not acceptable to God. I want to tell you, as a religious person, that they are flat out wrong. I think Christians should stay away from spiritual arrogance and show more love, mercy and zeal for justice. God loves you the way you are and God doesn’t want you to change. God doesn’t want you to be cured or healed, because there’s nothing to be healed from. You’re the way you are, the way God made you, the way God loves you. If you’re considering hurting yourself, please don’t. God wants you to live in the light of God’s love, and that light will take away all of this darkness. So, hang in there, be strong, and know that despite the messages that you get from religious people, God loves you beyond your wildest imagining, and only wants the best for you. It gets better, I promise. It gets so much better. —Bishop Gene Robinson
Documentos relacionados
May 13th 2016
Church—to stop investing in the fossil fuel industry. In the two years since religious scholars first called for fossil fuel divestment on moral grounds, our colleagues in the scientific community ...
Leia maislove your neighbor news
had practiced polygamy for thousands of years. Increasingly, the European Christians’ insistence upon a man having only one wife destroyed families and left many women and children destitute and st...
Leia mais