Urinary Incontinence evaluation in Women who Live in Riverside

Urinary Incontinence evaluation in Women who Live in
Riverside Community
Aljerry Rego; Jorge Haddad
U3
Figure 2 – Evaluation of Prevalence for Urinary Complaints in women resident in
Igarapé da Fortaleza, Macapa, Amapa (July 2011 to January 2012)
Aims of Study
To evaluate the prevalence of urinary incontinence and
risk factors for developing this pathology in women who
live in riverside Community in Amapa State, Brazil.
Prevalence of Urinary Complaints
Material and Methods
29%
Observational study, was performed in Igarapé da
Fortaleza (Affluent of Amazonas river), at Amapa State,
Brazil from 1st July 2011 to 31st January 2012 .
U1
71%
Figure 1 – Photo from Igarapé da Fortaleza, Macapa, Amapa.
With Stress Urinary Incontinence
Without Urinary Incontinence
U4
Figure 3 – Evaluation of Average of variables related to gynecological-obstetrical
antecedents and Body Mass Index of Women resident in Igarapé da Fortaleza,
Macapa, Amapa. (July 2011 to January 2012)
Average of data related to Risk factors for
Urinary Incontinence
45
40
35
30
235 women with more than 18 years old were
analyzed to evaluate the prevalence of urinary
incontinence and risk factors for developing this
pathology.
The patients were evaluated by the questionnaire
about their urinary symptoms and risk factors as age,
parity, menstrual status and body mass index (BMI) were
analyzed. For this analysis the patients were divided in
two groups- with stress urinary incontinence group (UIG)
and without urinary incontinence (CG).
The main economic activity is the fishing Açaí
extraction. The patients are submitted normally to vaginal
delivery. The connection among the houses is by the
bridges of wood.
Written informed consent was obtained from the
patients and the study was approved by Ethics
Committee.
The statistical analysis were performed by BioEstat
5.3 version software.
Results
The prevalence of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) was
28.9% (CI- 23.1%- 34.7%). The analysis of the age, BMI
and parity showed that there was significant difference
between the groups.
The other variables as vaginal or cesarean delivery,
weight of the baby and menopause there were not
significant difference.
25
20
U2
15
10
5
0
SUIG
CG
Relevance (p value)
Parity
Age
BMI*
4.7
4.1
0.307
42.2
37.9
0.002
26.9
24.8
0.0009
Natural
Labor
4.4
4.2
0.3703
Cesarean
Labor
1.6
1.4
0.5257
Weight
(Baby)
3.58
3.43
0.1747
Parity (Quantity); Age (in Years); Natural Labor (Quantity); Cesarean Labor
(Quantity); Weight/Baby (in Kg).
Concluding Message
The prevalence of stress urinary incontinence in
women who live in a riverside Community in Brazil was
28.9%.
The risk factors with significant difference for
developing stress urinary incontinence in this
Community were: age, parity and obesity.
References
1. Minassian V. et al. Urinary incontinence as
worldwide problem. International Journal of gynecology
and obstetrics. 2003.
2. Liapis A. et al. Epidemiology of urinary incontinence
in the Greek population: EURIG study. Int. urogynecol
J. 2010.
3. Rortveit Guri et al. Urinary incontinence after vaginal
delivery or cesarean section. The new England journal
of medicine. 2003.
Slide 1
U1 Acrescentei as
legendas das fotos e
gráficos, pois é
necessário esclarecer o
que foi analisado e
delimitar a população
USER, 10/6/2014
U2 Tomei a liberdade de
modificar aquela tabela
que tinha as variáveis
analisadas em um
gráfico, pois acho que
fica visualmente mais
atraente para o pôster
e poderíamos
condensar as
informações, bem
como estabelecer
adequadamente o que
foi analisado e as
unidades em que
encontram-se os
números. Caso prefira
a tabela mesmo, pode
modificar
USER, 10/6/2014
U3 Vide comentário 1
USER, 10/6/2014
U4 Vide Comentário 1
USER, 10/6/2014